| Question | Score from 1 to 5 of the answers |
| How was the application procedure? | Too complicated | 0 % | 3 % | 23 % | 40 % | 34 % | Easy and clear |
| Did you get enough information about the Exchange conditions? | No | 3 % | 0 % | 11 % | 31 % | 54 % | yes |
| What do you think of the IPSF Web Site? | Very unclear | 3 % | 6 % | 17 % | 37 % | 37 % | Very clear |
| How was the assistance provided by your SEO? Was it easy to get in contact with the SEO? | Bad | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | 0 % | very good! |
| Did those activities fulfil your expectations? | No | 14 % | 14 % | 23 % | 29 % | 20 % | Very much |
| Was it easy to reach the place where you stayed? | No , very difficult | 0 % | 3 % | 9 % | 23 % | 66 % | Yes , no transport problems |
| Did you feel at home at the place where you stayed? | Not at all | 9 % | 3 % | 20 % | 34 % | 34 % | Very much |
| Was your employer interested in teaching you? | Not at all | 3 % | 3 % | 23 % | 31 % | 40 % | Very interested |
| Do you think the work you did was interesting? | Not at all | 6 % | 3 % | 23 % | 26 % | 43 % | Very interesting |
| Do you think you learned enough during your traineeship? | Not at all | 6 % | 6 % | 23 % | 29 % | 37 % | Yes I do |
| Did the work correspond to the information that you received before the traineeship? | Not at all | 6 % | 9 % | 11 % | 17 % | 57 % | Yes |
| Did you experience any communication problems during your traineeship? | Not at all | 57 % | 31 % | 0 % | 6 % | 6 % | Yes , many |
| Was this too much? | Not at all | 66 % | 23 % | 9 % | 3 % | 0 % | Yes far too much |
| Did you get the opportunity to visit the country? | Not at all | 0 % | 3 % | 3 % | 31 % | 63 % | Yes more than enough |
| Were the traineeship and visit as you expected? | Not at all | 0 % | 3 % | 6 % | 20 % | 71 % | Yes I am very |
| Would you advise other students to apply for this association's SEP? | Not at all | 0 % | 3 % | 3 % | 6 % | 89 % | Yes definitely |
Evaluations of students that went to Croatia
| 16/07/2005 - 30/07/2005 : very positive evaluation |
| 15/07/2005 - 05/08/2005 : HU/04/00010: very positive evaluation |
| 19/07/2006 - 16/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 17/07/2006 - 19/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 18/07/2006 - 19/08/2006 : EG1/06/00117: very positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2006 - 21/08/2006 : neutral evaluation |
| 05/08/2006 - 29/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 31/07/2006 - 30/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : very positive evaluation |
| 30/07/2006 - 31/08/2006 : positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2007 - 07/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2007 - 21/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2007 - 21/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2007 - 21/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 31/07/2007 - 27/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 31/07/2007 - 27/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 31/07/2007 - 29/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 07/08/2007 - 31/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 07/08/2007 - 31/08/2007 : very positive evaluation |
| 26/07/2008 - 16/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 26/07/2008 - 16/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 22/07/2008 - 19/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 22/07/2008 - 19/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 03/08/2008 - 22/08/2008 : negative evaluation |
| 26/07/2008 - 23/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 26/07/2008 - 23/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 22/07/2008 - 28/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 22/07/2008 - 28/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 09/08/2008 - 30/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 01/08/2008 - 31/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
| 21/07/2008 - 31/08/2008 : very positive evaluation |
 |