France

back to the world map
The Student Exchange Officer in France : Kevin Gros
The name and abbreviation of the association : A.N.E.P.F ( Association Nationale des Étudiants en Pharmacie de France ) French National Pharmaceutical Student\'s Association.
Total number of places per year? (approximately) : Working Season : mainly May-October. 15 places.
Area possibilities?
- Community/ hospital/ industry/ research in a university/ other?
- Can you describe the work in more detail? : 		In community but this year we try to found some place in industry .
Length of training periods? (usually 1-3 months) : 3 weeks-2 months.
Available months and cities ?
- Specify whether or not full month is required
- Comments? : 		It is very difficult to find placements with accomodation and it is expensive to rent a room or something. That is why we do not have archimede places for the moment.
The type of accommodation?
- Student residence/ family/ hostel/ other?
- Paid by: the student/ the host association/ employer/ others? If paid by the student how much is it approximately : 		Student residence or in pharmacist\'s family.
Board, pocket money or other financial benefits/ remuneration?
- Board paid by: the student/ the host association/ employer/ others?
- Pocket money provided (Yes / No)?
- Other po : 		No pocket money but sometimes pharmacist can give remuneration.
Social events? Possible presence of other exchange student at the same time in the same city (students of pharmacy or other fields)? : No information
Language requirements : French pharmacist don\'t speak english in the most of case so students have to speak french more than begginer.
Other requirements for the student?
- Minimum year of study?
- Graduated? : 		2 year but we can try to place 1 year student ;)
Information on Work Permits and Visa : Sometimes an insurance can be required by pharmacist . It cost 65 euros per month.
Selection Procedures?
- Deadline to apply?
- % Bilateral exchanges usually done?
- Choice of the Exchange Student by: the SEO / the host (employer)? : 		May 20 % Employer or SEO
Special remarks : No information
: No information
: no information
: no information
This information has been updated the last time on 2008-10-30

answers from the evaluation of student that that went to France .

Question Score from 1 to 5 of the answers
How was the application procedure?Too complicated0 %5 %18 %50 %27 %Easy and clear
Did you get enough information about the Exchange conditions?No9 %5 %18 %18 %50 %yes
What do you think of the IPSF Web Site?Very unclear0 %14 %27 %41 %18 %Very clear
How was the assistance provided by your SEO? Was it easy to get in contact with the SEO?Bad0 %0 %0 %0 %0 %very good!
Did those activities fulfil your expectations?No23 %23 %23 %14 %18 %Very much
Was it easy to reach the place where you stayed?No , very difficult0 %5 %14 %0 %82 %Yes , no transport problems
Did you feel at home at the place where you stayed?Not at all0 %9 %0 %27 %64 %Very much
Was your employer interested in teaching you?Not at all0 %0 %9 %14 %77 %Very interested
Do you think the work you did was interesting?Not at all0 %0 %14 %36 %50 %Very interesting
Do you think you learned enough during your traineeship?Not at all0 %0 %5 %23 %73 %Yes I do
Did the work correspond to the information that you received before the traineeship?Not at all0 %9 %18 %5 %68 %Yes
Did you experience any communication problems during your traineeship?Not at all41 %32 %23 %5 %0 %Yes , many
Was this too much?Not at all45 %9 %27 %18 %0 %Yes far too much
Did you get the opportunity to visit the country?Not at all0 %9 %23 %23 %45 %Yes more than enough
Were the traineeship and visit as you expected?Not at all0 %9 %0 %36 %55 %Yes I am very
Would you advise other students to apply for this association's SEP?Not at all0 %0 %5 %9 %86 %Yes definitely

Evaluations of students that went to France

  • 04/07/2005 - 30/07/2005 : positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/08/2005 - 31/08/2005 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/07/2006 - 09/08/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/08/2006 - 31/08/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 28/07/2006 - 01/09/2006 : CZ/05/00046: very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 31/07/2006 - 01/09/2006 : PT4/05/00231: very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/07/2006 - 15/09/2006 : positive evaluation
    		•
  • 31/08/2006 - 30/09/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 30/08/2006 - 30/09/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/09/2006 - 15/10/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/09/2006 - 30/11/2006 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 09/05/2007 - 30/05/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/07/2007 - 31/07/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 21/07/2007 - 21/08/2007 : neutral evaluation
    		•
  • 03/08/2007 - 24/08/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/08/2007 - 31/08/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 06/08/2007 - 02/09/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 03/09/2007 - 06/10/2007 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 06/07/2008 - 31/07/2008 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 09/07/2008 - 04/08/2008 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 03/08/2008 - 31/08/2008 : very positive evaluation
    		•
  • 01/08/2008 - 01/09/2008 : very positive evaluation
    		•